Economic analysis helps design and selects projects that contribute to the welfare of a country. Economic analysis is most useful when used early in the project cycle to identify poor projects and poor project components. If used at the end of the project cycle, economic analysis can only help determine whether to proceed with a project or not. When used solely to calculate a single summary measure, such as the project’s net present value (NPV) or economic rate of return (ERR), economic analysis serves a limited purpose.
The tools of economic analysis can help answer various
questions about the project’s impact on the entity undertaking the project, on society,
and on various stakeholders. They can also help identify the project’s risks
and assess its sustainability. In particular, these tools can help
• Determine whether the private or the public sector
should undertake the project
• Estimate its fiscal impact
• Determine whether the arrangements for cost recovery
are efficient and equitable
• Assess its potential environmental impact and
contribution to poverty reduction.
This article provides a toolkit that helps answer these
questions; however, it does not provide a recipe for every possible instance.
The procedure set out is an iterative process that should begin early in the
project cycle and be used throughout it. This procedure works best when
analysts use all the information available about the project, including the
financial evaluation and the sources of divergence between financial and
economic prices.
The Economic Setting
A project cannot be divorced from the context in which it
takes place. The relationship of the project to the broader development
objectives for the sector and for the country is an integral part of its
economic justification. Early in the assessment of a project, analysts should
always ascertain that the project fits with the broader country and sector
strategies. The key role of the policy and institutional framework must also be
discussed. More important, because research indicates that environments with
low distortions produce more successful projects than highly distorted
environments (Kaufmann 1991), analysts should ensure that sectoral policies and
macroeconomic preconditions, as well as the institutional framework, are
conducive to good project performance. Also, to ensure project effectiveness, analysts
must identify key distortions that should be removed prior to project
implementation.
Rationale for Public Sector Involvement
Worldwide, the private sector increasingly provides goods
and services that a few decades ago were deemed to be properly in the domain of
the public sector. Two main reasons account for this development. First, a growing,
albeit inconclusive, body of evidence indicates that the public sector is less
efficient than the private sector when engaged in market oriented activities.1 Second,
technological changes are making it possible to have competition in markets
that have traditionally been considered natural monopolies.
What, then, is the economic justification for public
provision of goods and services?
As discussed in appendix 1A, government intervention in
the provision of goods and services is justifiable if the project addresses a
market failure, or if it reduces poverty. In every case calling for government
intervention, analysts must identify the market failure that prevents the
private sector from producing the socially optimal quantity of the good or
service, and they must show that society will be better-off as a result of
government involvement. In short, analysts must show that the benefits of
government involvement will outweigh the costs. The strength of the case for government involvement
depends on institutional arrangements; legal, regulatory, and political
conditions; and external circumstances, conditions that vary from country to
country, and within a particular country, from year to year. In addition to
economic considerations, there are also equity, political, and strategic
considerations. Consequently, no hard and fast rules enable decision makers to
come unmistakably to the conclusion that government involvement will make the
country better off, and each case must be decided on its merits.
The tools of economic analysis developed can help Analysts
• Judge whether the project would be financially viable
if done by the private sector
• Assess the magnitudes of externalities associated with
the project
• Estimate the impact of policy distortions and market
failures on the project’s economic and financial flows
• Identify the incidence of costs and benefits on various
groups in society.
These important considerations help decide whether the
project should be done by the public sector.
0 comments:
Post a Comment