Monday, September 23, 2013

Getting the Flows Right: Identifying Costsand Benefits



Identifying costs and benefits is the first and most important step in economic
analysis. Often project costs and benefits are difficult to identify and
measure, especially if the project generates side effects that are not reflected
in the financial analysis, such as air or water pollution. Identifying the costs
and benefits of a project is one of the most important steps in economic
analysis. A second important step is to quantify them. The final step is to
value them in monetary terms.

The projected financial revenues and costs are often a good starting
point for identifying economic benefits and costs, but two types of adjustments
are necessary. First, we need to include or exclude some costs and
benefits. Second, we need to revalue inputs and outputs at their economic
opportunity costs. Financial analysis looks at the project from the perspective
of the implementing agency. It identifies the project’s net money flows
to the implementing entity and assesses the entity’s ability to meet its financial
obligations and to finance future investments. Economic analysis,
by contrast, looks at a project from the perspective of the entire country, or
society, and measures the effects of the project on the economy as a whole.
These different points of view require that analysts take different items
into consideration when looking at the costs of a project, use different valuations
for the items considered, and in some cases, even use different rates
to discount the streams of costs and benefits.

Financial analysis assesses items that entail monetary outlays. Economic
analysis assesses the opportunity costs for the country. Just because the
project entity does not pay for the use of a resource, does not mean that the
resource is a free good. If a project diverts resources from other activities that produce goods or services, the value of what is given up represents an
opportunity cost of the project to society. Many projects involve economic
costs that do not necessarily involve a corresponding money flow from the
project’s financial account. For example, an adverse environmental effect
not reflected in the project accounts may represent major economic costs.
Likewise, a money payment made by the project entity—say the payment
of a tax—is a financial but not an economic cost. It does not involve the use
of resources, only a transfer from the project entity to the government. Finally,
some inputs—say the services of volunteer workers—may be donated,
entailing no money flows from the project entity. Analysts must also
consider such inputs in estimating the economic cost of projects.

Another important difference between financial and economic analysis
concerns the prices the project entity uses to value the inputs and outputs.
Financial analysis is based on the actual prices that the project entity pays
for inputs and receives for outputs. The prices used for economic analysis
are based on the opportunity costs to the country. The economic values of
both inputs and outputs differ from their financial values because of market
distortions created either by the government or by the private sector.
Tariffs, export taxes, and subsidies; excise and sales taxes; production subsidies;
and quantitative restrictions are common distortions created by governments.
Monopolies are a market phenomenon that can either be created
by government or the private sector. Some market distortions are
created by the public nature of the good or service. The values to society of
common public services, such as clean water, transportation, road services,
and electricity, are often significantly greater than the financial prices people
are required to pay for them. Such factors create divergence between the
financial and the economic prices of a project.

Economic and financial costs are always closely intertwined, but they
rarely coincide. The divergence between financial and economic prices
and flows shows the extent to which someone in society, other than the
project entity, enjoys a benefit or pays a cost of the project. Sometimes
such payments are in the form of explicit taxes and subsidies, as in a
sales tax; sometimes they are implicit, as in price controls. The magnitudes
and incidence of transfers are important pieces of information that
shed light on the project’s fiscal impact, on the distribution of its costs
and benefits, and, hence, on its likely opponents and supporters. By identifying
the groups benefiting from the project and the groups paying for
its costs, the analyst can extract valuable information about incentives
for these groups to implement the project as designed, or to support it
or oppose it.

A thorough evaluation should summarize all the relevant information
about the project. To look at the project from society’s and the implementing
agency’s viewpoint, to identify gainers and losers, and ultimately to
decide whether the project can be implemented and sustained, it is necessary
to integrate the financial, fiscal, and economic analyses and identify

the sources of the differences.

0 comments:

Post a Comment